Let's Achieve Anarchy. (Seriously!)

OK, I'm just going to come out and say that I'm an anarchist.  I don't know that we'll be able to get to a stateless (ie. governmentless) society in my lifetime, but I'm now convinced that it's not only possible but actually desirable: I believe that a world of anarchy -- meaning a world where there is no hierarchy of government force and all associations are voluntary -- will be overall a better world for us.  This conclusion has been a long time coming; many of you know that I've been pretty libertarian for many years now... I didn't seriously think that a society was possible without a government... but the more I study and look around the more I see that most everyone would benefit.  It may require smart people with good plans to pave the way, plus a lot of dedication and attention to the cause and a ton of luck... so I'm going to do all I can to help everyone see the benefits of voluntarism and the evils of "the state".

Let me reiterate something: anarchy doesn't mean chaos or no social order; political anarchy just means no enforced political hierarchy.  We'll still have police, courts, roads, welfare and all kinds of other things that government currently does... they just won't be owned by government and backed by aggression... they'll be done they way they've always evolved: naturally, and appropriate to the societal conditions.  I know, you may be worried that those with the biggest guns will own everything and the environment will be trashed, so read on.

Let me give the best argument I have for anarchy: "look around."

In addition to the philosophy (and there's to plenty to study), I will continually gather arguments:

• There are more and more P2P, voluntary, contractual, community, distributed solutions popping up all over the world: use RSS to subscribe to my bookmarks (see past ones here) or follow my future posts
• There is plenty of evidence every day that governments at every level oppress 99.99% of the people for the benefit of the politically well-connected: use RSS to subscribe to my bookmarks (see past ones here)

Just a quick note to my friends who may lean toward one side or other of the major US political parties:

• Republicans: I believe most of you value liberty, so keep your eyes open for evidence that the large corporations and large bureaucracies have the most access and favors from our politicians, so they are creating a system that weakens individual and small-scale power.
• Democrats: Since you value civil liberties, watch for how government force and policy can be changed at a whim; and since you value social good, watch for how the big corporate, political, and military players are always getting their own policies injected into the process.

Government is actually our enemy.  My hope is to kindly but directly demonstrate it to everyone, with philosophy, with real solutions, and by living it more and more in my life.

Cheers!

Projects Similar to P2P Docs

See other projects that seem related to mine.  It's kinda cool to see similar work going on.

I'm outraged at Turing's treatment, but it seems many haven't learned from it.

Most everyone agrees that the persecution of Alan Turing (for homosexual activity) was wrong.  However, I want to point out a mindset that I consider dangerous, and which will lead to more of this kind of oppression.  In explaining the House of Lords' rejection of a posthumous pardon, Lord McNally stated on Feb 2 that:

Alan Turing was properly convicted of what at the time was a criminal offence. He would have known that his offence was against the law and that he would be prosecuted.

Improper laws should not be supported.  We should not only abolish them, but also decry their creators and enforcers and declare that it was never right to support them in the first place.  Lord McNally's statement shows an opinion I see all too often: the support for laws just for the reason that they're laws.  I'm sorry, but I reject the idea that it is good to uphold oppression just to maintain order or just because it was decided by a group of so-called representatives; there is no virtue in unquestioning support of government rules.

Let's make it more popular to disobey bad laws (especially when done openly!).

RootsTech Presentation: Collaborating with Mom via P2P

Well, my presentation is done.  I'm happy to say that I finished enough of my tools to show off the essential parts:

• A tool where users can watch their shared file-system folders for changes from others
• ... which (diffs) can be reviewed and then accepted or rejected
• ... and where users can record their identity (from IDs in GEDCOM files and HTML files with microformat markup) and be notified when items of interest in their own ancestry get updated in their shared data files.

However, I'm sorry to say that my whole presentation was misguided:

• The user stories were too broad and ambitious to really fit the simple thesis implied by my title (where I originally aimed to make it a very simple, easy-to-use tool).
• The technical elements I reviewed and combined were more suited toward more advanced developers (and not the audience I attracted... which was small, by the way).

Basically, I still have a lot to learn about giving an effective presentation.  Well, it's been a good learning experience.  I've put online the syllabus and the final presentation, for what they're worth.  Let's hope I get a chance to refactor/reformulate/resurrect this again.

Tools and Intro to P2P Collaboration

OK, after researching, experimenting, and building, I can report on collaboration via P2P.

First, to restate the goal: I want to share family histories and other files, some with just my family and some with the whole world, and do it in a way that we all share the benefits as we each work on our own copies.  Yes, I said "copies": everyone should be able to play with all their data, on their own machine, with whatever tools they choose.  For more sample uses, see familyhistories.info.

Now, a single paragraph for this year in review: after failing to create a workable plugin for one P2P program, I found that all file sharing is not equal, but it's close enough... so it seemed a good idea to make something to cooperate with most file-sharing tools/models.  Thus began P2P-Docs, a program to keep track of your file libraries as well as the other copies of similar content that other people might be working on.  You point it to the files that others are sharing with you ("incoming") and the files that you are sharing with others ("outgoing"), and it will assist you in reviewing and reconciling changes as they get passed around.  It's wrapped with a simple search program, mostly to make it attractive bait for my relatives to be able to search for stories in our shared family histories.  So it feels good to have a deliverable as well as more instructions for actual use.

I've started inviting family and friends to share files.  I hope to have some back-and-forth collaboration before RootsTech 2012.  If you'd like to test out some sharing, contact me.

So... you can see there's a bunch of items that are "not done yet" in my project README.  I want to make these tools and instructions more useful for transferring files.  I'm most excited to give my peeps good tools to search through their information; I love the idea of organizing content by assigning semantics.  It's meaningful work (ha!).  But seriously... someday I assume our computers will parse through all our content and understand it completely enough that it can find everything for us... but even then, we determine what is interesting and important, and we'll apply these values as we search for answers and/or meaning in the electronic records being gathered.  Anyway, if you're interested in any aspect of this, well, interest is what drives what I do, so let's talk.  :-)

A Private Network of Data and Events (used to share family histories, and more)

I'm very excited about the future of sharing information.  Now, there are many projects that help distribute and share your stuff, but there aren't too many that allow you to keep it all to yourself but also share it selectively if you want.  I feel that nuance of private ownership is important: it may not seem like a big deal to let Facebook and Yahoo and Flickr host your data, until they shut down services or delete your account or send your info to the FBI.  I've been motivated by this interview of Eben Moglen published by the P2P Foundation... it really opened my eyes to the possibilities if we were to take charge of our own data on our own machines.

So I'm trying to make my own private network, where my friends share my data and can get updates if they like.

The first use case is for family histories:  I've started collecting histories of my ancestors, and I'm part of an organization with a large family database.  Now, I've put up a search where someone can find histories for people in their own ancestry.  The next step is to enable a text search through those histories, and also allow people to add other histories to the collection... but I've realized that, rather than build a central internet service where people go, I'd like to make it easy for people to have their own copies and use it all in their own private network.  I plan to share history (or even personal) files such that friends will get updates easily, then allow for tagging the history files with genealogical identifiers so that people can pull the ones of interest... and maybe even just pull pieces of data, such as small bits of data that might be part of my own ancestral database.

Does this kind of stuff already exist?  If so, please send me pointers.  If not, this may deserve a name... maybe P2P with events..  P2P3.  :-)

Here are some some other projects and people I'm watching closely:

• anything about the "personal data store/locker"
• Pull by David Siegel
• VRM, information cards
• Google's Data Liberation Front
• Phil Windley, Doc Searls, Dave Winer
• Diaspora (a distributed social network)
• something Sam Curren is doing (dunno what yet)

...

(Wow.  I started writing this to share some concrete ideas, and it just devolved into a general overview with no details; I even published that stuff above, forgetting my original intent.)

Here are my requirements:

• Share files with selected people
• Share groups of files with groups of people
• Share between individuals without the need of any central server
• Notify me about changes to files, and show me just those changes
• Notify me about new files someone has added, and let me choose whether to add it to mine
• Ideally: do the same for bits of information, such as ancestor data found in a history
• Install easily on Windows, Mac, Linux

I don't envision this as a platform for all types of information; it will most likely be less convenient than Facebook and Google... but I hope to help this type of technology mature such that people find it easy and important to store some of their info this way.

So here's my somewhat-more-concrete plan:

• Find some P2P program to leverage for sharing files (AllianceP2P looks interesting)
• Build plugins or something that defines which files to share and with whom
• Manage additions, eg. when a history file is added then my network will be notified of the addition
• Manage updates, eg. when a blog file is updated then my network will be notified of the update and be able to review the change
• Manage changes to linked data (and this part could be really fun), eg. have an ancestor database that notifies me when there's a change to the dataset (RDF?) in the histories in my ancestry while ignoring changes to branches that aren't in my line

Next step:

1. I can use AllianceP2P to define my own network of people and files to share.  Use that as the transport to sync files, and write a local app to detect changes to files and allow me to see the updates.

I'd love to hear your impressions.

Financial Collapse: It's both Wall Street AND Main Street

Lawrence Lessig is promoting the film Inside Job.  I'm glad; it looks like it'll be informative (and hopefully not just emotional).

However, Lawrence says, '... it is crazy—literally crazy—to point to "the losers" as the cause,' where "the losers" are everyday people being bailed out by government programs.  No, it's not crazy: a large part of our financial mess is due to a culture of greed in America, one where people are looking for quick, high returns without looking at the underlying process.  Stocks, securities, banks, and even government bonds all have some kind of risk.  It is unreasonable (an unsustainable) for our society to expect to close their eyes and give their money without understanding the businesses.  There is no guarantee of the future in any aspect of life, and there is definitely no way for everyone to get rich quick.

The only way to build a stable life is to work hard, be committed, and learn constantly.

OK, so not everyone who has lost is guilty.  But it is the prevailing culture in America... or it has been of late.  Let's hope we put that period behind us, rather than blaming some easily-identified targets and leaving it at that.